23 Discussion Questions
23.1 Think Deeply About What You’ve Learned
This chapter contains thought-provoking questions to test your understanding and encourage deeper thinking about genomics and proteomics!
23.2 How to Prove DNA Is Genetic Material?
23.2.1 The Question
If you lived in the 1940s before the famous experiments, how would YOU prove that DNA (not protein) is the genetic material?
23.2.2 Think About:
What you need to show:
Genetic material must carry information
It must be copied accurately
It must be passed from parent to offspring
Changes in it must cause changes in traits
Possible approaches:
1. Transformation Experiments (like Griffith):
Transfer genetic material between organisms
See if traits transfer
Then identify what molecule was transferred
2. Chemical Analysis:
Compare DNA vs. protein in chromosomes
Which molecule shows more variation?
Which correlates with heredity?
3. Treatment Experiments:
Destroy DNA specifically (with DNase enzyme)
Does heredity still work?
Destroy protein specifically (with protease enzyme)
Does heredity still work?
4. Labeling Experiments (like Hershey-Chase):
Tag DNA and protein differently
See which enters cells during infection
See which appears in offspring
23.2.3 Your Turn!
Design an experiment to prove DNA is genetic material. Consider:
What organism would you use? (bacteria, viruses, plants, animals?)
What techniques are available?
What results would prove your hypothesis?
What controls would you need?
23.3 Why Are Plant Genomes Larger?
23.3.1 The Question
We learned that plants often have much larger genomes than animals. An onion has 5 times more DNA than a human! Why is this?
23.3.2 Review the Reasons:
1. Plants Don’t Move:
Animals need efficient cells for movement
Large genomes are costly (more DNA to replicate)
Plants can afford the extra DNA
2. Polyploidy:
Plants tolerate multiple genome copies
Wheat has 6 sets of chromosomes!
Animals usually can’t survive polyploidy
3. Transposable Elements:
“Jumping genes” accumulate in plant genomes
Some plants are >90% transposable elements
Less pressure to remove them
4. Less DNA Deletion:
Animals efficiently delete unnecessary DNA
Plants less so
“Junk DNA” accumulates over time
23.3.3 Discussion Points:
Question 1: Is a larger genome a disadvantage for plants? Why or why not?
Think about:
Energy cost of replicating more DNA
But plants make energy from sunlight (abundant!)
Larger cells (more DNA = larger nucleus = larger cell)
But plants don’t move anyway
Question 2: Could this change with climate change?
Consider:
If resources become scarce
If plants need to adapt quickly
Smaller genomes might become advantageous
Or polyploidy might help adaptation!
Question 3: Why do some plants (like pufferfish) have very compact genomes?
Answer hints:
Pufferfish need buoyancy
Smaller cells help float
Shows environmental pressures CAN favor small genomes
23.4 How Does Alternative Splicing Expand Protein Diversity?
23.4.1 The Question
Humans have only ~20,000 genes but make 100,000+ different proteins. How does alternative splicing explain this?
23.4.2 Review Alternative Splicing:
Remember:
Genes have exons (coding) and introns (non-coding)
Exons can be included or excluded
Different combinations → different proteins
Example:
Gene with exons 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Could make:
Protein A: 1-2-3-4-5
Protein B: 1-2-4-5 (skip exon 3)
Protein C: 1-3-4-5 (skip exon 2)
Protein D: 1-2-5 (skip exons 3 and 4)
23.4.3 Calculate Diversity:
Math time!
If a gene has 10 exons, and each can be included or excluded:
That’s 2^10 = 1,024 possible proteins!
From ONE gene!
Extreme example:
DSCAM gene in fruit flies
Can produce 38,000 different proteins
From one gene!
23.4.4 Discussion Points:
Question 1: What are the advantages of alternative splicing?
Advantages:
More proteins without more genes
Saves space in genome
Fine-tuned regulation (different proteins in different tissues)
Evolutionary flexibility
Question 2: What are the disadvantages?
Disadvantages:
Complex regulation needed
Mistakes can happen (wrong splicing → disease)
Harder to predict proteins from DNA sequence
Question 3: Why don’t prokaryotes use alternative splicing?
Think about:
Prokaryotes have no introns!
Simpler, more direct gene expression
Don’t need the complexity
Different lifestyle (single cells, respond quickly to environment)
23.5 What Does the C-Value Paradox Teach Us About Evolution?
23.5.1 The Question
The C-value paradox shows that genome size doesn’t correlate with complexity. What does this teach us about evolution?
23.5.2 Key Lessons:
1. Evolution Doesn’t Always Optimize
Not everything is perfectly designed
“Good enough” often survives
Extra DNA isn’t harmful enough to be removed
Evolution works with what’s there, not ideal designs
Question: Does this surprise you? Why or why not?
2. Different Solutions for Different Lifestyles
Compact genomes work for some organisms (pufferfish)
Large genomes work for others (lungfish, onions)
No single “best” strategy
Context matters!
Question: Can you think of other examples in evolution where different solutions work equally well?
3. Complexity Comes from Regulation, Not Raw Material
It’s HOW you use genes, not how many you have
Like cooking: A master chef can make amazing food with simple ingredients
A novice cook might waste fancy ingredients
Question: How does this apply to human intelligence vs. other animals?
4. The Importance of Non-Coding DNA
Used to think “junk DNA” was useless
Now we know much of it regulates genes
The “junk” paradox helped us discover this!
Question: What else might we be wrong about that seems like “junk”?
23.5.3 Broader Implications:
For understanding life:
Life is complex in unexpected ways
Simple measurements (genome size) don’t capture complexity
Need to look deeper
For medicine:
Can’t judge genes by quantity alone
Regulation matters as much as genes themselves
Epigenetics is crucial!
For technology:
Biological systems inspire engineering
Efficiency isn’t always the goal
Redundancy and flexibility have value
23.6 How Does Genome Organization Affect Sequencing and Analysis?
23.6.1 The Question
We’ve learned about chromosome structure, packaging, and organization. How do these affect our ability to sequence and analyze genomes?
23.6.2 Challenges:
1. Repetitive DNA
Problem:
Many genomes have lots of repeated sequences
Short sequencing reads can’t tell repeats apart
Like trying to assemble a puzzle with many identical pieces!
Solution:
Long-read sequencing spans repeats
Can see which repeat is which
Question: Why do you think it took until 2022 to complete the human genome when the first draft was in 2000?
2. Heterochromatin
Problem:
Tightly packed DNA is hard to sequence
Centromeres, telomeres were gaps in original human genome
Very repetitive, very condensed
Solution:
Better sequencing technology
Long reads
Specialized methods
3. DNA Modifications
Problem:
DNA methylation affects how DNA behaves
Standard sequencing doesn’t detect modifications
Lost information!
Solution:
Bisulfite sequencing for methylation
Third-generation sequencing detects modifications directly
4. Chromosome Structure
Problem:
Genes interact across long distances
Enhancers can be far from genes they control
3D structure matters!
Solution:
Hi-C and other 3D genome mapping methods
Capture chromosome conformation
23.6.3 Applications:
Disease Understanding:
Structural variants (large chromosomal changes) cause disease
Repeats can expand and cause disease (Huntington’s)
Understanding 3D structure reveals regulation
Evolution:
Chromosome rearrangements drive evolution
Gene order matters
Comparing organization across species
23.6.4 Discussion:
Question 1: If you were designing the “perfect” genome for easy sequencing and analysis, what would it look like?
Possible features:
No repeats
No introns
Evenly spaced genes
No heterochromatin
Linear (not circular)
Medium-sized
Question 2: But would that “perfect” genome be good for the organism? Why or why not?
Trade-offs:
Repeats have functions!
Introns allow alternative splicing
Heterochromatin regulates genes
Complexity enables complexity!
Question 3: How might future technology overcome current limitations?
Ideas:
Even longer reads
Real-time 3D genome imaging
Single-molecule sequencing in living cells
AI to predict structure from sequence
23.7 Synthesis Questions
23.7.1 Connecting Everything Together
Big Question 1: How do the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and epigenome work together?
Think about:
Genome: The instruction manual (static)
Transcriptome: Which instructions are being read (dynamic)
Proteome: The workers doing jobs (dynamic)
Epigenome: Bookmarks and highlights (semi-stable)
They all interact and influence each other!
Big Question 2: If you could sequence anything, what would you choose and why?
Options:
Your own genome?
An endangered species?
Microbes in your gut?
Ancient DNA from fossils?
Soil microbes?
Tumor cells?
Big Question 3: What’s the next big breakthrough in genomics/proteomics?
Possibilities:
Routine gene therapy for all genetic diseases?
Complete understanding of non-coding DNA?
Cheap real-time genome sequencing?
Sequencing in living organisms (no extraction)?
Full protein structure prediction for all proteins?
Understanding consciousness through genomics?
23.8 Key Takeaways
Critical thinking is essential in science
One experiment can answer big questions (if cleverly designed)
Trade-offs exist in biology (no perfect solution)
Complexity comes from organization, not just components
Technology limits and enables discovery
Big questions often have complex answers
Keep asking “why?” and “how do we know?”
These questions don’t have single right answers. They’re meant to make you think deeply about what you’ve learned. Discuss with others, do more research, and form your own conclusions!